The UC Architects Podcast Ep27


iTunes-Podcast-logo[1]We’re glad to announce the availability of episode 27 of The UC Architects podcast.

This episode is hosted by Steve Goodman, Pat Richard, Michael van Hoorenbeeck, John Cook, Serkan Varoglu, Tim Harrington, Johan Veldhuis and yours truly. Special guests are Andrew Higginbotham (Exchange MCM), Brian Reid (Exchange MCM, Instructor), and Jeff Guillet (Exchange MCM, MVP).

This is a special episode on the cancellation of the MCM/MCSM and MCA certifications by Microsoft, the impact on the certification market, MCM/MCSMs and those aspiring the certification and to the IT Professional community in general.

Special thanks to Andrew J. Price for some blitz editing.

More information on the podcast including references and a link to download the podcast directly here or you can subscribe to the podcasts using iTunes, Zune or use the RSS feed.

About
The UC Architects is a bi-weekly community podcast by people with a passion for Unified Communications; our main focus is on Exchange, Lync or related subjects.

MCM/MCSM & MCA R.I.P. (Update)


mcsmlogo Still recovering from the announcement to retire TechNet, IT Professionals get dealt another blow by the announcement retirement of the Microsoft Certified Master (MCM), Microsoft Certified Solutions Master (MCSM) and Microsoft Certified Architect (MCA) programs:

“We are contacting you to let you know we are making a change to the Microsoft Certified Master, Microsoft Certified Solutions Master, and Microsoft Certified Architect certifications. As technology changes so do Microsoft certifications and as such, we are continuing to evolve the Microsoft certification program. Microsoft will no longer offer Masters and Architect level training rotations and will be retiring the Masters level certification exams as of October 1, 2013. The IT industry is changing rapidly and we will continue to evaluate the certification and training needs of the industry to determine if there’s a different certification needed for the pinnacle of our program.”
(For the complete e-mail, consult MSFT and MCSM:Messaging trainer Neil Johnson’s blog here).

This announcement is causing quite a stir in the community and those having or aspiring the certifications mentioned. The general response is – I’ll use a less stronger word here – disappointment over the decision and the impression is that, together with the cancellation of TechNet (and perhaps what still lies ahead), this is part of Microsoft’s grand scheme to push their cloud strategy upon us. I can only assume that angry IT professionals mob is considered collateral damage.the-spanish-inquisition-framed

What also seems to frustrate people is the timing and notice period. First, the e-mail (which is the only information available at the moment) was sent on Saturday morning (GMT+1, so still Friday in the US) with labor day coming up on Monday in the US (holiday). Second, rotations are no longer offered as of now and exams will retire per October 1st, 2013. I read some tweets of people set for a rotation in October, receiving a 1 month cancellation notice. It can be real painful if you went to a rotation but still need to take the exam. That seems impossible and is bad PR. That’ll be some interesting e-mail messages and phone calls on Tuesday for @MSLearning, I reckon.

Given the full certification program costs $18k and recertification nearly $14k, apart from pre-reading, study, time and travel invested, some joined – or got employers to send them to MCSM – achieving to become a skilled IT Professional certified at a level which can compete with high level certifications provided by vendors like Cisco, making IT professionals stand out of the crowd, at the price of triennial recertification.Some customers even put in MCSM/MCA certification as a requirement for certain projects; that’s how MCSM/MCA is valued.

Now that total investment is set to expire forever. In what looks like an attempt at downplaying the impact of this, current MCM, MCSM and MCA certified may now to keep their credential and are not required to recertify, which was a requirement of the MCSM program to stay certified. But to be honest, how is an “MCM:Exchange 2007” certification valued by customers in 2013 when there are products of 2 newer generations?

Some responses from the community; as you can see, it doesn’t only hurt the Exchange and Lync professionals:

What are your thoughts on the MCM/MCSM/MCA retirement? Let me know in the comments.

Someone from the SQL community opened up an item on Connect where you can vote to keep MCSM. When you disagree with the termination of MCSM/MCA, let your voice be heard there as well.

Update (30aug): Tim Sneath, Sr. Director at MS Learning, provided a response on the decision to retire MCM/MCSM and MCA certifications in the comments section here.

Update (7Sep): The Connect item has been removed due to “trolling” per request of the original poster, Jen Stirrup. So, you can’t vote anymore and the feedback from the community on the decision – including Tim Sneath’s response – is now unavailable. You can find a cached copy of the page here and a copy of Sneath’s integral response here.

Update (10Sep): Apparently there was a (250 capped!) conference call yesterday, where MS claimed the program wasn’t delivering up to expectations (of MS Learning). Going after the article, it was more of Tim Sneath monologue as MCM/MCSM/MCA weren’t allowed to put anything on the table. What was announced was the following:

  • Exam offerings are extended for addional 90 days (December);
  • Refunds for those who have taken courses in order to achieve MCM/MCSM/MCA certification;
  • Preservation of course material until 2016.

 

EighTwOne Facebook Page


FB_Pic1A small notice as I’ve started an EighTwOne Facebook page next to my personal profile to channel communications. Rest assured that it’s additional and nothing on this blog regarding posts, having the ability to comment etc. will change.

By liking the page, you can use Facebook’s timelines or notification system to be informed on new blog posts, news, updates etc. Also, you can use Facebook to ask questions or take part in discussions using the comments system.

The EighTwOne Facebook page is available at http://www.facebook.com/eightwone821

Exchange 2013 CU2 v2


Ex2013 LogoCumulative Update 2 for Exchange Server 2013 was re-released today.  This re-release fixes a serious permission issue when moving modern public folders mailboxes around, as described by the Exchange team here. For more information on changes already incorporated in the original CU2, check the original post on CU2 here.

The part which might confuse some people is that they updated the version of the CU (like they did for some Rollups in the past) while keeping the knowledge base article KB2859928 and download link identical to the original CU2; only the version number has been increased a notch (15.0.712.24). When you download the file it will contain a v2 postfix, i.e. Exchange2013-KB2859928-x64-v2.exe, which is helpful for identification purposes.

Because of the “every server is an island” principle, you don’t need to stick to a certain order when implementing Exchange 2013 updates and in theory you can just update your Mailbox servers. However, be advised that Exchange 2013 security fixes – which are CU level bound as mentioned here and emphasized here – will be based on CU2v2, which means you ultimately must implement CU2v2 on all of your Exchange 2013 servers.

Note that CU2v2 is a full installation set. Before installing CU2v2, make sure to save customized OWA settings as the web.config files might get overwritten causing OWA to use default settings (see KB2871485).

As with any update, I’d recommend to thoroughly test this in a test and acceptance environment first (re-releases make a great business case), prior to implementing it in production.

You can download Exchange 2013 CU2 v2 here.

TechNet Subscriptions Retirement

Image


Only 3 days ago, the (Microsoft) IT Pro community was surprised and shocked by an e-mail they received from Microsoft regarding retirement of TechNet Subscriptions after its introduction 15 years ago:

Microsoft is retiring the TechNet Subscription service.
As IT trends and business dynamics have evolved, so has Microsoft’s set of offerings for IT professionals who are looking to learn, evaluate and deploy Microsoft technologies and services. In recent years, we have seen a usage shift from paid to free evaluation experiences and resources.  As a result, Microsoft has decided to retire the TechNet Subscriptions service and will discontinue sales on August 31, 2013.

This means that after August 31, you won’t be able to purchase a subscription for downloading software for test and evaluation purposes. When you buy a subscription, you also need to activate it before September 30, 2013. Microsoft will honor current subscriptions, meaning its TechNet Subscriptions end of life date will be August 31, 2014. More information in the TechNet Subscriptions FAQ.

As part of the announcement, Microsoft suggests using time bombed evaluation software from the TechNet Evaluation Center, TechNet Virtual Labs or buying an MSDN subscription amongst other things. Not surprisingly, the majority of the IT Pro world cried foul:

TechNet Evaluation Center
Time bombed evaluation software is no replacement. For example, I have various environments set up in my lab which I use for research, blogging or articles, develop and test scripts, test (customer) scenarios, try to reproduce issues, evaluate 3rd party software, etc. I also use it to deploy environments for demonstration purposes. I don’t consider redeploying and reconfiguring all those environments on a frequent basis an option, apart from the fact that Evaluation Center only offers the recent generation of products.

TechNet Virtual Labs
TechNet Virtual Labs are very limited and aimed at exploring products and exams.

MSDN subscriptions
MSDN subscriptions are way more expensive and are primarily aimed at developers.TechNet Standard entry subscription with all non-developer software (e.g. OS, Exchange, Sharepoint, Lync) costs $199 ($149 renewal) while Professional with Enterprise software and Dynamics costs $349 ($249 renewal). Compared with MSDN‘s entry Subscription which costs $699 ($499 renewal, only getting you Operating Systems and some dev kits .. which IT Pro needs those?) MSDN is inferior. If you’re looking for a matching MSDN replacement which includes server software like Exchange, you’re looking at a $6.119 ($2.569 renewal) Subscription!

Microsoft Virtual Academy
Very limited and not representative of hands-on experience.

As for myself, my subscription expires July 26th, 2013. I’m curious, how does this decision affect you? Let me know in the comments section below.

Meanwhile, if you disagree with Microsoft’s decision, let your voice be heard by signing this petition for an affordable, TechNet comparable MSDN Subscription as an alternative. Microsoft also reversed Xbox One online check and used game policies and will reintroduce the “Start” button in Windows 8.1, so who knows.