Setting up Disclaimers in Exchange 2010 SP1


Disclaimers are a controversial subject when added to e-mail messages; some lawyers think they should be mandatory for business communications, some think they’re just jibber-jabber. Fact of the matter is that your e-mail message may end up anywhere and in some countries you can’t legally bind recipients after receiving something he or she may not even wished to receive in the first place. If you’re interested, Exchange fellow Tony Redmond blogged shortly on some legal aspects of disclaimers in June here.

Despite the disputed legal status of these disclaimers, I am however consulted on how to configure them once in a while, so here’s how to implement them properly in Exchange 2010 SP1.

Disclaimers are set up using transport rules. You can inspect the current set of transport rules in the Exchange Management Console (EMC) under Organization Configuration > Hub Transport > Transport Rules or by using the Get-TransportRule cmdlet using the Exchange Management Shell (EMS). By default there will be no transport rules defined.

Before we begin you need to be aware of the following:

  • Transport rules will be processed in the order of priority. If a message meets the conditions configured in a transport rule, the actions defined in that rule will be processed. When done, the Exchange will continue evaluating transport rules with a higher priority number (so rule with priority will be evaluated first);
  • Adding disclaimers will invalidate signed and may corrupt encrypted messages.

This introduces the following complications:

  • When using multiple disclaimers, you need to mark the message after processing to prevent processing by one of the other transport rules. If you don’t, disclaimers will pile up at the end of your message.
  • Strangely enough, you can only make an exception for signed or encrypted messages, not both. This means that when you create a rule it is either for unsigned or unencrypted messages; what we want here is rules for unsigned, unencrypted messages.

To work around these limitations, we’ll use message classification for tagging encrypted or signed messages, so we can use that tag in the exception clause. In additional we’ll use custom message headers for flagging processed messages. Note that we could use custom headers for signed, encrypted messages as well but we don’t want to add yet another unnecessary named property.

We’ll start off by create the rules which are going to tag encrypted or signed e-mail messages. We choose to use message classifications for this purpose, so we need to add a new message classification first. This can only be performed using the EMS using the New-MessageClassification cmdlet:

New-MessageClassification “SignedOrEncrypted” –DisplayName “Signed or Encrypted Message” –SenderDescription “Signed or Encrypted Message” –PermissionMenuVisible:$false

image

The DisplayName and SenderDescription parameters are mandatory and their purpose is to state the purpose of the classification when displaying the message in Outlook. By setting PermissionMenuVisible to $false, users won’t be able to assign this classification to messages Outlook themselves.

Next, we’ll set up the transport rules to tag messages using this classification. Since these will be the first transport rules we’re going to create we don’t need to worry about the priority numbers yet. Since there isn’t much editing required with these rules, we can use EMS to define these rules:

New-TransportRule “Tag Encrypted Messages” –Enabled $true –MessageTypeMatches “Encrypted” –ApplyClassification “SignedOrEncrypted”

New-TransportRule “Tag Signed Messages” –Enabled $true –MessageTypeMatches “Signed” –ApplyClassification “SignedOrEncrypted”

image

Now we can start setting up the default (English) disclaimer using transport rules. This default disclaimer will be the default disclaimer attached to all outgoing e-mail messages. Using EMC, open up the Transport Rules tab and select New Transport Rule. Fill in a proper description and click Next.

Now we can select the conditions to meet in order for the rule to be processed. In this example, select From users that are inside or outside the organization and Sent to users that are inside or outside the organization or partners. In the bottom pane you can now fine tune these conditions by clicking on the underlined elements. Click Inside the organization, part of sent to users condition. Set this parameter to Outside the organization. When finished, click Next.

image

Next we’ll define the actions for this rule. First, select Append disclaimer text and fallback to action if unable to apply. In the bottom pane, leave append unchanged so the disclaimer will be added to the bottom of the message. Note that Exchange can’t insert the disclaimer below replies, only at the end of the complete message. Click disclaimer text and insert your disclaimer text in the editing window. Note that you can use HTML here as well as certain Active Directory attributes to make the disclaimer dynamic. For information on which Active Directory attributes are available, consult this TechNet article. When make use of HTML options, I suggest editing it in an HTML editor or something similar, so you can preview the result. Also, when using styles include those as well. Finally, leave wrap unchanged so Exchange will create a new message using the disclaimer text attach the original message attached if the disclaimer can’t be inserted in the original message.

Second, check Set header with value. Set header to X-Disclaimer and value to Yes. Note that this value is case-sensitive when we’re matching it later on. When finished, click Next.

image

Now we can enter exceptions for this rule. Select Except when the message is marked as classification and set classification to Signed or Encrypted Message. This will make sure that signed or encrypted messages tagged earlier will be skipped. Also check Except when the message header contains specific words; set Message header to X-Disclaimer and specific words to Yes. This will make sure the message is skipped when we’ve already added a disclaimer. When done, click Next.

image

Check the generated cmdlet on the configuration summary screen and click New to create the transport rule. Click Finish when done. Note that this rule will be added with Priority 0, so you need to alter the order setting Priority of this rule to the highest value possible, e.g. 2. As stated before, rules will be evaluated in ascending priority order.

Now we’re set up for a default disclaimer in English, but suppose you want to add a different disclaimer in a different language for users working in a different country. In order to establish this repeat the above steps for creating a disclaimer using transport rule, but at the conditions page add an additional condition by selecting When the sender’s properties contain specific words, setting the Property CountryOrRegion to the country code required, e.g. NL. To see which country code you need to use, consult the ISO 3166 table or check the C attribute in Active Directory (CountryOrRegion in OPATH maps to the C attribute in LDAP).  Needless to say, this filtering requires that the sender’s Country has been configured properly in Active Directory.

image

Then on the actions page, configure the alternative disclaimer text. After saving, don’t forget to put this rule before the default disclaimer rule by changing it’s Priority to n-1 , i.e. when the default disclaimer has priority 3 set the priority for this country specific disclaimer to 2.

image

The way this works is as follows:

  1. The first two rules will set the classification to SignedOrEncrypted for signed or encrypted messages;
  2. The Disclaimer NL rule checks the sender’s CountryOrRegion attribute; when it’s NL and the message isn’t classified as SignedOrEncrypted and the message doesn’t contain an “X-Disclaimer” header field with a value of “Yes”, it will add the configured disclaimer and set the header field “X-Disclaimer” to “Yes”;
  3. The Disclaimer (Default) rule checks if the message isn’t classified as SignedOrEncrypted and the message doesn’t contain an “X-Disclaimer” header field with a value of “Yes”. When both are not true, it will add the configured disclaimer and set the header field “X-Disclaimer” to “Yes”. This rule will be skipped for messages by sender with CountryOrRegion NL because the Disclaimer NL rule will be processed earlier and will add X-Disclaimer=Yes to the header.

Visio of Exchange 2010 SP1 Network Ports Diagram v0.31


By popular demand and since many of you requested this: I’ve put the Visio file of the Exchange 2010 SP1 Network Ports Diagram online. The original post in PDF format is of April 5th.

If you got any comments or additions worth sharing, do not hesitate to write ’em down in the comments or send me an e-mail. When used, crediting or a reference is appreciated.

The Visio document can be downloaded from here.

The case of the missing Free/Busy public folder


A customer who recently migrated to Exchange 2010 and was still in the co-existence setup with Exchange 2003, reported lots of users experiencing issues with regards to Free/Busy information. Symptoms were inaccurate or missing Free/Busy information, which especially gets annoying when scheduling appointments.

It turned out these users were using Outlook 2003; users on Outlook 2007 or later experienced no issues. As you probably know, Outlook 2003 still utilizes public folders to publish users’ Free/Busy information. This information is consulted by Outlook 2003 when scheduling appointments; Outlook 2007 or later uses Exchange Web Services for this purpose.

A quick look in the Eventlog revealed lots of 14031 errors were generated by the FreeBusy Assistant:

Err14031

This told us Exchange was unable to store Free/Busy information in a public folder, in this case /o=EUROPE/ou=First Administrative Group. A quick look at the Public Folder Management Console in Exchange 2010 showed that the folder didn’t exist. Since the Free/Busy public folder to be used by an Outlook 2003 user is determined by the legacyExchangeDN attribute, this was the cause of the issue.

The reason for the folder’s absence was unknown so one can only speculate. My best guess is improper decommissioning of the organization and administrative group originally hosting those users, identified by that “orphaned” legacyExchangeDN.

With the Free/Busy public folder missing and the original Exchange infrastructure gone, there are two alternatives to resolving this issue, apart from upgrading clients to a recent version of Outlook of course:

  1. Edit the legacyExchangeDN attribute of the users affected;
  2. Recreate the Free/Busy public folder.

The 1st option has consequences for the users, like being able to reply to earlier e-mail by co-workers. This can be resolved by adding the current legacyExchangeDN as an X500 address to the current set of e-mail addresses, but that also makes things a bit messy.

The 2nd option is to recreate the Free/Busy public folder; Here’s how to proceed:

  1. First, using the Exchange System Manager (luckily, Exchange 2003 was still present), create an Administrative Group, e.g. First Administrative Group
  2. Then, using ADSIedit.msc, navigate to CN=<Administrative Group>,CN=Administrative Groups,CN=<Organization>,CN=Microsoft Exchange,CN=Services,CN=Configuration,DC=<domain>
  3. Right-click the Administrative Group, e.g. First Administrative Group, and click Properties. There, edit the legacyExhangeDN attribute. Set it to match the missing Free/Busy public folder, e.g. /o=EUROPE/ou=First Administrative Group
  4. Next, edit the siteFolderServer attribute. Set it to match the distinguishedName of a a public folder database. Note that you can pick the Exchange 2003 as well as Exchange 2010 Public Folder database here. In this example, I picked the Exhange 2003 public folder database, hence the storage group (SG1):

siteFolderServer

Now we need to wait for the store to recreate the Free/Busy public folder during its maintenance cycle, which may take up to 24h. If you’re in a hurry, and the situation allows you because of the service interruption, you can also restart the Information Store. When the Information Store has created the Free/Busy public folder, event 3047 is logged by the MSExchangeIS Public Store:

Recreate_FB_PF

To verify this, startup the Public Folder Management Console or any other Public Folder management tool, and you’ll see the newly created folder:

PFMC_Appear

After a while you’ll notice Outlook 2003 users are now storing their Free/Busy information in this public folder and Free/Busy will work again for these users. You can verify clients are storing Free/Busy information using EMS, ExFolders or MFCMAPI, e.g.:


Finally, don’t forget to create replicas of this new Free/Busy public folder when appropriate.

Exchange 2010 SP1 Rollup 4 v2


After pulling Rollup 4 for Exchange Server 2010 SP1 on July 13th, after potential data loss issues were discovered during folders movements, and publishing an intermediate hotfix to resolve the RU4 issues without a rollup rerelease, the Exchange team decided to publish an updated version of rollup 4. This is somehow unexpected because of the expected release of rollup 5 in August. It’s good to see the Exchange team getting very open in this post about recent missteps in published rollups for such a mission critical application.

Exchange 2010 SP1 Rollup 4 v2 raises Exchange 2010′s version number to 14.1.323.6 (initial release was 14.1.323.1). The related knowledgebase article is kb2579150.

For the correct procedure on how to update a DAG and its members, check here.

You can download Exchange 2010 SP1 Rollup4 v2 here.

Exchange 2010 SP1 RU4 pulled


Just a quick notice that few minutes ago the Exchange Team pulled Exchange Server 2010 Service Pack 1 Rollup 4.

As reported earlier, there were potential data loss issues with this rollup when moving folders around in public folders or PST files using any version Outlook; Note that moving folders using OWA through Exchange Web Services works fine.

A fix for this issue will be incorporated in the RU5 update which is scheduled for August. So, like RU3 v2 v3 which took about a month to appear after the initial RU3 release was pulled, we’ll have to wait until August for RU5.

For those who already deployed RU4 an interim update has been made available that fixes this issue. The interim update can be obtained by contacting support.